Dubai, United Arab Emiratesfor a tourist / visitor
Strong fit
Weighted to a tourist / visitor's priorities, Dubai scores 71/100 — strong fit. No OECD house-price valuation for United Arab Emirates, so the property entry-window is not scored — AI-Home's DLD data fills this.
Experience, access, safety and total trip cost — short stay, so structural growth is irrelevant.
Scorecard — the factors this profile weights
| Factor | Weight | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 20% | 85 | seed |
| Tourism | 18% | 90 | seed |
| Big Mac affordability | 14% | 76 | ● live |
| Affordable cost of living | 12% | 24 | seed |
| Mobility | 10% | 74 | seed |
| Air quality | 10% | 55 | seed |
| Low climate risk | 8% | 45 | seed |
| Health outcomes | 8% | 94 | ● live |
Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.
Why it works
- Safety 85/100 · 20% weight
- Tourism 90/100 · 18% weight
- Big Mac affordability 76/100 · 14% weight
- Mobility 74/100 · 10% weight
Why it may not
- Affordable cost of living 24/100 · 12% weight
Property entry-window
Valuation not covered. OECD publishes no house-price series for United Arab Emirates, so AGI will not fabricate an over/undervaluation. Demand 82, financing 89 shown instead. Pair with AI-Home's DLD-verified district data.
The same market, every profile
Dubai ranks best for a rental-income investor (88) and worst for a corporate professional (61). Suitability, not popularity.
Next: the actual properties
This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in Dubai:
View Dubai listings for a tourist / visitor on AI-Home ↗