AI Global Index — Decision Report
Zurich, Switzerlandfor a tourist / visitor
74
Market Fit
Strong fit
Strong fit
Weighted to a tourist / visitor's priorities, Zurich scores 74/100 — strong fit. Property entry-window: Open (score 75).
Experience, access, safety and total trip cost — short stay, so structural growth is irrelevant.
Scorecard — the factors this profile weights
| Factor | Weight | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 20% | 88 | seed |
| Tourism | 18% | 74 | seed |
| Big Mac affordability | 14% | 81 | ● live |
| Affordable cost of living | 12% | 5 | seed |
| Mobility | 10% | 90 | seed |
| Air quality | 10% | 82 | seed |
| Low climate risk | 8% | 72 | seed |
| Health outcomes | 8% | 98 | ● live |
Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.
Why it works
- Safety 88/100 · 20% weight
- Tourism 74/100 · 18% weight
- Big Mac affordability 81/100 · 14% weight
- Mobility 90/100 · 10% weight
Why it may not
- Affordable cost of living 5/100 · 12% weight
Property entry-window
OpenValuation 80 · Demand 44 · Financing 99 · Title 88 · Climate 72 · price-to-income 116.2 (100 = long-run avg)
The same market, every profile
Family office / institutional83
Business expansion77
Tourist / visitor74
Bank / mortgage lender73
Family buying a home70
Entrepreneur / startup70
Retail brand69
Corporate professional69
Real estate developer68
Capital-appreciation investor58
Government / municipality58
Rental-income investor56
Zurich ranks best for a family office / institutional (83) and worst for a rental-income investor (56). Suitability, not popularity.
Next: the actual properties
This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in Zurich:
View Zurich listings for a tourist / visitor on AI-Home ↗