Shanghai, Chinafor a government / municipality
Conditional fit
Weighted to a government / municipality's priorities, Shanghai scores 57/100 — conditional fit. No OECD house-price valuation for China, so the property entry-window is not scored — AI-Home's DLD data fills this.
Sustainable urban growth — housing accessibility, services and quality of life, not price growth.
Scorecard — the factors this profile weights
| Factor | Weight | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Housing affordability | 16% | 53 | seed |
| Health outcomes | 12% | 80 | ● live |
| Education | 12% | 72 | seed |
| Infrastructure | 12% | 86 | seed |
| Affordable cost of living | 12% | 40 | seed |
| Air quality | 10% | 42 | seed |
| Employment | 10% | 63 | ● live |
| Low climate risk | 8% | 48 | seed |
| Population growth | 8% | 14 | seed |
Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.
Why it works
- Health outcomes 80/100 · 12% weight
- Education 72/100 · 12% weight
- Infrastructure 86/100 · 12% weight
Why it may not
- Affordable cost of living 40/100 · 12% weight
- Air quality 42/100 · 10% weight
- Population growth 14/100 · 8% weight
Property entry-window
Valuation not covered. OECD publishes no house-price series for China, so AGI will not fabricate an over/undervaluation. Demand 45, financing 94 shown instead. Pair with AI-Home's DLD-verified district data.
The same market, every profile
Shanghai ranks best for a family buying a home (68) and worst for a rental-income investor (46). Suitability, not popularity.
Next: the actual properties
This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in Shanghai:
View Shanghai listings for a government / municipality on AI-Home ↗