AI Global Index — Decision Report
London, United Kingdomfor a tourist / visitor
62
Market Fit
Conditional fit
Conditional fit
Weighted to a tourist / visitor's priorities, London scores 62/100 — conditional fit. Property entry-window: Open (score 69).
Experience, access, safety and total trip cost — short stay, so structural growth is irrelevant.
Scorecard — the factors this profile weights
| Factor | Weight | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 20% | 60 | seed |
| Tourism | 18% | 80 | seed |
| Big Mac affordability | 14% | 47 | ● live |
| Affordable cost of living | 12% | 15 | seed |
| Mobility | 10% | 78 | seed |
| Air quality | 10% | 66 | seed |
| Low climate risk | 8% | 65 | seed |
| Health outcomes | 8% | 90 | ● live |
Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.
Why it works
- Tourism 80/100 · 18% weight
- Mobility 78/100 · 10% weight
- Air quality 66/100 · 10% weight
- Low climate risk 65/100 · 8% weight
Why it may not
- Affordable cost of living 15/100 · 12% weight
Property entry-window
OpenValuation 75 · Demand 41 · Financing 90 · Title 78 · Climate 65 · price-to-income 116.3 (100 = long-run avg)
The same market, every profile
Family office / institutional79
Bank / mortgage lender74
Business expansion68
Entrepreneur / startup66
Family buying a home63
Tourist / visitor62
Real estate developer59
Retail brand57
Government / municipality56
Capital-appreciation investor55
Rental-income investor54
Corporate professional51
London ranks best for a family office / institutional (79) and worst for a corporate professional (51). Suitability, not popularity.
Next: the actual properties
This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in London:
View London listings for a tourist / visitor on AI-Home ↗