AI Global Index — Decision Report

Tokyo, Japanfor a government / municipality

9 Sep 2026Methodology profiles-1.0.0Data confidence 90/1002 of 9 factors live
64
Market Fit
Conditional fit

Weighted to a government / municipality's priorities, Tokyo scores 64/100conditional fit. Property entry-window: Open (score 72).

Sustainable urban growth — housing accessibility, services and quality of life, not price growth.

Scorecard — the factors this profile weights

FactorWeightScoreSource
Housing affordability16%53seed
Health outcomes12%97● live
Education12%80seed
Infrastructure12%90seed
Affordable cost of living12%28seed
Air quality10%70seed
Employment10%95● live
Low climate risk8%50seed
Population growth8%0seed

Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.

Why it works

  • Health outcomes 97/100 · 12% weight
  • Education 80/100 · 12% weight
  • Infrastructure 90/100 · 12% weight
  • Air quality 70/100 · 10% weight

Why it may not

  • Affordable cost of living 28/100 · 12% weight
  • Population growth 0/100 · 8% weight

Property entry-window

OpenValuation 100 · Demand 13 · Financing 100 · Title 80 · Climate 50 · price-to-income 87.6 (100 = long-run avg)

The same market, every profile

Tourist / visitor77
Family buying a home75
Bank / mortgage lender68
Family office / institutional68
Entrepreneur / startup66
Government / municipality64
Business expansion62
Corporate professional62
Retail brand54
Real estate developer50
Rental-income investor47
Capital-appreciation investor46

Tokyo ranks best for a tourist / visitor (77) and worst for a capital-appreciation investor (46). Suitability, not popularity.

Next: the actual properties

This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in Tokyo:

View Tokyo listings for a government / municipality on AI-Home ↗