AI Global Index — Decision Report
Tokyo, Japanfor a tourist / visitor
77
Market Fit
Strong fit
Strong fit
Weighted to a tourist / visitor's priorities, Tokyo scores 77/100 — strong fit. Property entry-window: Open (score 72).
Experience, access, safety and total trip cost — short stay, so structural growth is irrelevant.
Scorecard — the factors this profile weights
| Factor | Weight | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 20% | 88 | seed |
| Tourism | 18% | 76 | seed |
| Big Mac affordability | 14% | 100 | ● live |
| Affordable cost of living | 12% | 28 | seed |
| Mobility | 10% | 92 | seed |
| Air quality | 10% | 70 | seed |
| Low climate risk | 8% | 50 | seed |
| Health outcomes | 8% | 97 | ● live |
Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.
Why it works
- Safety 88/100 · 20% weight
- Tourism 76/100 · 18% weight
- Big Mac affordability 100/100 · 14% weight
- Mobility 92/100 · 10% weight
Why it may not
- Affordable cost of living 28/100 · 12% weight
Property entry-window
OpenValuation 100 · Demand 13 · Financing 100 · Title 80 · Climate 50 · price-to-income 87.6 (100 = long-run avg)
The same market, every profile
Tourist / visitor77
Family buying a home75
Bank / mortgage lender68
Family office / institutional68
Entrepreneur / startup66
Government / municipality64
Business expansion62
Corporate professional62
Retail brand54
Real estate developer50
Rental-income investor47
Capital-appreciation investor46
Tokyo ranks best for a tourist / visitor (77) and worst for a capital-appreciation investor (46). Suitability, not popularity.
Next: the actual properties
This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in Tokyo:
View Tokyo listings for a tourist / visitor on AI-Home ↗