AI Global Index — Decision Report
Amsterdam, Netherlandsfor a family buying a home
71
Market Fit
Strong fit
Strong fit
Weighted to a family buying a home's priorities, Amsterdam scores 71/100 — strong fit. Property entry-window: Ajar (score 64).
Safety, stability, affordability and long-term quality of life — return never outweighs these.
Scorecard — the factors this profile weights
| Factor | Weight | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 16% | 76 | seed |
| Low lethal violence | 14% | 98 | ● live |
| Health outcomes | 12% | 91 | ● live |
| Education | 12% | 80 | seed |
| Housing affordability | 12% | 41 | seed |
| Air quality | 10% | 70 | seed |
| Affordable cost of living | 10% | 20 | seed |
| Low climate risk | 8% | 68 | seed |
| Mobility | 6% | 86 | seed |
Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.
Why it works
- Safety 76/100 · 16% weight
- Low lethal violence 98/100 · 14% weight
- Health outcomes 91/100 · 12% weight
- Education 80/100 · 12% weight
Why it may not
- Housing affordability 41/100 · 12% weight
- Affordable cost of living 20/100 · 10% weight
Property entry-window
AjarValuation 56 · Demand 40 · Financing 94 · Title 84 · Climate 68 · price-to-income 136.2 (100 = long-run avg)
The same market, every profile
Family office / institutional84
Bank / mortgage lender81
Family buying a home71
Business expansion71
Entrepreneur / startup69
Tourist / visitor68
Government / municipality64
Real estate developer63
Retail brand62
Capital-appreciation investor59
Corporate professional59
Rental-income investor56
Amsterdam ranks best for a family office / institutional (84) and worst for a rental-income investor (56). Suitability, not popularity.
Next: the actual properties
This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in Amsterdam:
View Amsterdam listings for a family buying a home on AI-Home ↗