AI Global Index — Decision Report
Amsterdam, Netherlandsfor a retail brand
62
Market Fit
Conditional fit
Conditional fit
Weighted to a retail brand's priorities, Amsterdam scores 62/100 — conditional fit. Property entry-window: Ajar (score 64).
Customer spending and commercial viability — enough wallets, affordable space.
Scorecard — the factors this profile weights
| Factor | Weight | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer readiness | 20% | 57 | seed |
| Purchasing power | 18% | 40 | seed |
| Tourism | 14% | 82 | seed |
| Digital readiness | 12% | 88 | seed |
| Rent affordability | 10% | 47 | seed |
| Business environment | 10% | 82 | seed |
| Population growth | 10% | 43 | seed |
| Inbound migration | 6% | 72 | seed |
Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.
Why it works
- Tourism 82/100 · 14% weight
- Digital readiness 88/100 · 12% weight
- Business environment 82/100 · 10% weight
- Inbound migration 72/100 · 6% weight
Why it may not
- Purchasing power 40/100 · 18% weight
- Population growth 43/100 · 10% weight
Property entry-window
AjarValuation 56 · Demand 40 · Financing 94 · Title 84 · Climate 68 · price-to-income 136.2 (100 = long-run avg)
The same market, every profile
Family office / institutional84
Bank / mortgage lender81
Family buying a home71
Business expansion71
Entrepreneur / startup69
Tourist / visitor68
Government / municipality64
Real estate developer63
Retail brand62
Capital-appreciation investor59
Corporate professional59
Rental-income investor56
Amsterdam ranks best for a family office / institutional (84) and worst for a rental-income investor (56). Suitability, not popularity.
Next: the actual properties
This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in Amsterdam:
View Amsterdam listings for a retail brand on AI-Home ↗