AI Global Index — Decision Report

Amsterdam, Netherlandsfor a entrepreneur / startup

9 Sep 2026Methodology profiles-1.0.0Data confidence 90/1001 of 8 factors live
69
Market Fit
Conditional fit

Weighted to a entrepreneur / startup's priorities, Amsterdam scores 69/100conditional fit. Property entry-window: Ajar (score 64).

Low entry barriers, talent and digital infrastructure — runway matters more than market size.

Scorecard — the factors this profile weights

FactorWeightScoreSource
Business environment20%82seed
Digital readiness18%88seed
Education14%80seed
Affordable cost of living12%20seed
Governance / title security12%84seed
GDP growth12%23● live
Low overall risk6%79seed
Infrastructure6%88seed

Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.

Why it works

  • Business environment 82/100 · 20% weight
  • Digital readiness 88/100 · 18% weight
  • Education 80/100 · 14% weight
  • Governance / title security 84/100 · 12% weight

Why it may not

  • Affordable cost of living 20/100 · 12% weight
  • GDP growth 23/100 · 12% weight

Property entry-window

AjarValuation 56 · Demand 40 · Financing 94 · Title 84 · Climate 68 · price-to-income 136.2 (100 = long-run avg)

The same market, every profile

Family office / institutional84
Bank / mortgage lender81
Family buying a home71
Business expansion71
Entrepreneur / startup69
Tourist / visitor68
Government / municipality64
Real estate developer63
Retail brand62
Capital-appreciation investor59
Corporate professional59
Rental-income investor56

Amsterdam ranks best for a family office / institutional (84) and worst for a rental-income investor (56). Suitability, not popularity.

Next: the actual properties

This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in Amsterdam:

View Amsterdam listings for a entrepreneur / startup on AI-Home ↗