AI Global Index — Decision Report
Amsterdam, Netherlandsfor a tourist / visitor
68
Market Fit
Conditional fit
Conditional fit
Weighted to a tourist / visitor's priorities, Amsterdam scores 68/100 — conditional fit. Property entry-window: Ajar (score 64).
Experience, access, safety and total trip cost — short stay, so structural growth is irrelevant.
Scorecard — the factors this profile weights
| Factor | Weight | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 20% | 76 | seed |
| Tourism | 18% | 82 | seed |
| Big Mac affordability | 14% | 49 | ● live |
| Affordable cost of living | 12% | 20 | seed |
| Mobility | 10% | 86 | seed |
| Air quality | 10% | 70 | seed |
| Low climate risk | 8% | 68 | seed |
| Health outcomes | 8% | 91 | ● live |
Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.
Why it works
- Safety 76/100 · 20% weight
- Tourism 82/100 · 18% weight
- Mobility 86/100 · 10% weight
- Air quality 70/100 · 10% weight
Why it may not
- Affordable cost of living 20/100 · 12% weight
Property entry-window
AjarValuation 56 · Demand 40 · Financing 94 · Title 84 · Climate 68 · price-to-income 136.2 (100 = long-run avg)
The same market, every profile
Family office / institutional84
Bank / mortgage lender81
Family buying a home71
Business expansion71
Entrepreneur / startup69
Tourist / visitor68
Government / municipality64
Real estate developer63
Retail brand62
Capital-appreciation investor59
Corporate professional59
Rental-income investor56
Amsterdam ranks best for a family office / institutional (84) and worst for a rental-income investor (56). Suitability, not popularity.
Next: the actual properties
This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in Amsterdam:
View Amsterdam listings for a tourist / visitor on AI-Home ↗