Istanbul, Turkeyfor a tourist / visitor
Monitor
Weighted to a tourist / visitor's priorities, Istanbul scores 52/100 — monitor. No OECD house-price valuation for Turkey, so the property entry-window is not scored — AI-Home's DLD data fills this.
Experience, access, safety and total trip cost — short stay, so structural growth is irrelevant.
Scorecard — the factors this profile weights
| Factor | Weight | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 20% | 55 | seed |
| Tourism | 18% | 78 | seed |
| Big Mac affordability | 14% | 0 | ● live |
| Affordable cost of living | 12% | 54 | seed |
| Mobility | 10% | 62 | seed |
| Air quality | 10% | 44 | seed |
| Low climate risk | 8% | 50 | seed |
| Health outcomes | 8% | 78 | ● live |
Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.
Why it works
- Tourism 78/100 · 18% weight
- Health outcomes 78/100 · 8% weight
Why it may not
- Big Mac affordability 0/100 · 14% weight
- Air quality 44/100 · 10% weight
Property entry-window
Valuation not covered. OECD publishes no house-price series for Turkey, so AGI will not fabricate an over/undervaluation. Demand 57, financing 0 shown instead. Pair with AI-Home's DLD-verified district data.
The same market, every profile
Istanbul ranks best for a family buying a home (66) and worst for a rental-income investor (32). Suitability, not popularity.
Next: the actual properties
This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in Istanbul:
View Istanbul listings for a tourist / visitor on AI-Home ↗