São Paulo, Brazilfor a tourist / visitor
Monitor
Weighted to a tourist / visitor's priorities, São Paulo scores 48/100 — monitor. No OECD house-price valuation for Brazil, so the property entry-window is not scored — AI-Home's DLD data fills this.
Experience, access, safety and total trip cost — short stay, so structural growth is irrelevant.
Scorecard — the factors this profile weights
| Factor | Weight | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 20% | 42 | seed |
| Tourism | 18% | 64 | seed |
| Big Mac affordability | 14% | 11 | ● live |
| Affordable cost of living | 12% | 48 | seed |
| Mobility | 10% | 54 | seed |
| Air quality | 10% | 52 | seed |
| Low climate risk | 8% | 52 | seed |
| Health outcomes | 8% | 74 | ● live |
Live = World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist (dated). Seed = illustrative pending a licensed feed. Market Fit renormalizes by weight, so it is comparable 0–100.
Why it works
- Health outcomes 74/100 · 8% weight
Why it may not
- Safety 42/100 · 20% weight
- Big Mac affordability 11/100 · 14% weight
Property entry-window
Valuation not covered. OECD publishes no house-price series for Brazil, so AGI will not fabricate an over/undervaluation. Demand 42, financing 74 shown instead. Pair with AI-Home's DLD-verified district data.
The same market, every profile
São Paulo ranks best for a bank / mortgage lender (64) and worst for a rental-income investor (43). Suitability, not popularity.
Next: the actual properties
This report is the macro decision — which market, for whom. For the districts, projects, yields and DLD-verified transactions in São Paulo:
View São Paulo listings for a tourist / visitor on AI-Home ↗