Suitability, not popularity

The index changes with who you are

A market that suits a rental-income investor can be wrong for a family, a developer, a lender or a retail brand. Twelve profiles reweight the same evidence into a personalized Market Fit Score. Every weight is shown, editable, resettable and shareable — and what a profile cannot yet measure is named rather than invented.

Real estate

Business

Living

Capital preservation and risk-adjusted return — governance and liquidity over headline growth.

Highest-weighted:Governance / title security 18%Low overall risk 16%Currency stability 14%●Economic resilience 14%Data confidence 12%

Not yet covered (no free global source — never invented): Market depth, exit liquidity, capital mobility, institutional-grade asset supply, taxation, portfolio fit.

Methodology profiles-1.0.0 · scores renormalize so any weighting yields a comparable 0–100

Adjust the weights (8 factors)

Governance / title security18%Low overall risk16%Currency stability●14%Economic resilience14%Data confidence12%Price stability (low inflation)●10%Low public debt10%Infrastructure6%

Market Fit — ranked for a family office / institutional

Market	Fit	vs overall rank	Governance / title security	Low overall risk	Currency stability	Economic resilience	Confidence
1Amsterdam Netherlands	84	▲ +6	84	79	82	74	90
2Sydney Australia	84	▲ +4	82	75	92	77	89
3Singapore Singapore	84	—	86	83	93	86	90
4Dubai United Arab Emirates	83	—	70	79	81	82	80
5Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates	83	▼ -3	72	79	81	82	78
6Berlin Germany	83	▲ +5	82	79	82	73	89
7Zurich Switzerland	83	▼ -6	88	82	42	89	92
8New York United States	82	▼ -3	76	75	100	80	92
9Los Angeles United States	80	▲ +1	74	72	100	78	90
10Stockholm Sweden	80	▲ +5	86	66	78	55	90
11London United Kingdom	79	▲ +2	78	74	81	71	88
12Toronto Canada	79	▼ -3	82	70	89	65	88
13Seoul South Korea	77	▼ -1	74	77	53	74	86
14Riyadh Saudi Arabia	77	▼ -6	60	74	79	71	70
15Paris France	75	▲ +2	76	67	82	57	88
16Mexico City Mexico	71	▲ +3	50	63	99	61	68
17Tokyo Japan	68	▼ -3	80	76	39	74	90
18Shanghai China	68	▼ -2	58	70	52	61	64
19São Paulo Brazil	62	▲ +1	52	52	67	45	70
20Mumbai India	60	▼ -2	55	66	29	55	66
21Istanbul Turkey	50	▲ +1	48	29	96	13	62
22Cairo Egypt	47	▼ -1	48	46	32	31	60

How this profile changed the ranking: weighting toward governance / title security and low overall risk moves Amsterdam up 6 places versus the site's balanced Overall ranking. A market can rank first here and poorly elsewhere — that is suitability, not popularity.

Ready to look at actual properties? Explore Amsterdam listings as a family office / institutional on AI-Home ↗ — your profile travels with you. Or generate the macro decision report (PDF) ↗.

Same market, every profile

Market

Family office / institutional82

Bank / mortgage lender76

Business expansion74

Entrepreneur / startup68

Real estate developer64

Tourist / visitor64

Retail brand60

Family buying a home58

Rental-income investor57

Capital-appreciation investor57

Government / municipality54

Corporate professional54

New York scores 82 for a family office / institutional but 54 for a corporate professional — the same market, opposite conclusions, because the two users weight different evidence.

Factors are built only from indicators AGI holds — inflation, unemployment, health, lethal violence, GDP growth and Big Mac figures are live (World Bank / UNODC / OECD / The Economist); the rest are labeled seed. Weights are version-controlled (profiles-1.0.0) and never change silently. Not investment advice — a suitability screen, not a recommendation. Full methodology →